[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: X locale vs glibc locale again

To: locale@sensi.org
Subject: Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
From: Leon Kanter <leon@blackcatlinux.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:05:56 +0300
References: <39ACB90B.F40E7F14@blackcatlinux.com> <39ACCC42.E48B79A3@logic.ru> <39ACEF45.BEB358A0@blackcatlinux.com> <39AD44C5.5B2B2FFC@logic.ru>
Reply-To: locale@sensi.org
Sender: owner-locale@sensi.org

Aleksey Novodvorsky wrote:

> > Нет такого линка, тем не менее именно с xterm все работает как положено.
> > И даже LANG=ru_RU xterm -fn la-la-la-iso8859-5 дает полноценный
> > iso5-терминал.
>
> Так вот это -- нормально. ru_RU собрана с 8859-5.

Это ясно, но куда оно все делось с 4.0.1/2.1.92???

--
                                 /\**/\
Leon B. Kanter    LK258-RIPE    ( o_o  )_)     leon@blackcatlinux.com
http://www.blackcatlinux.com   _,(u  u  ,),_   2:465/148@fidonet

References:
- X locale vs glibc locale again
  - From: Leon Kanter <leon@blackcatlinux.com>
- Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
  - From: Aleksey Novodvorsky <aen@logic.ru>
- Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
  - From: Leon Kanter <leon@blackcatlinux.com>
- Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
  - From: Aleksey Novodvorsky <aen@logic.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
Next by Date: Re: Для RU.LINUX FAQ
Prev by thread: Re: X locale vs glibc locale again
Next by thread: xfsft & XFree 4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread